PSALM. 12:6; 19:7
Psalm 12:6, The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
Psalm 19:7, The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple.
Psalm 19:7, The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple.
SUBJECT: The Credibility Of The Bible
THEME:
today
we will learn that the inspired books of the Bible are completely reliable and
credible. We will also endeavor to set
forth the Bible’s credentials by other well-known established facts. In doing this, we will avoid circular reasoning,
that is using the Bible to prove the Bible’s accuracy. Instead we will construct empirical
(experimental or observable) evidences which further support the biblical truth
of inerrancy by using external proofs.
RELEVANCY:
many times our arguments from the Scriptures are discounted by skeptics and
unbelievers because they reject the authority and accuracy of the Bible. How
then can we convince a “doubter” that the Bible is indeed a credible source of
information? If we grasp this lesson
well, we will have the ammunition we need to answer the skeptics and prayerfully win them to our Lord Jesus Christ eventually.
INTRODUCTION:
1) The Revelation in the Bible Is Accurate
(John 17:17),
Progressive (Heb. 1:1), and Purposeful (2 Tim.
3:15-17). The root problem
with liberals and skeptics is their failure or refusal to believe the Bible. No
man who has humble, unwavering faith in the Bible is a liberal!
Why do we believe the world was created in six literal
days? Or that Jonah was swallowed by a great fish prepared by God? Or why do we accept the teachings that Jesus
Christ was born of a virgin and walked on water and rose from the dead the
third day? Why? Simply because the Bible
plainly teaches this! The Bible destroys liberalism and liberalism seeks to
destroy the Bible.
2) Scripture Should Be Taken For What it
Says.
Primarily, two approaches exist as to the credibility of
the scriptural revelation. One Camp
(Fideists) insists that “the Scripture and the revelation it contains
is self-authenticating, or that they validate themselves” (that is,
autopistic). Of course we believe in the infallibility and the inspiration of
the Scripture. In addition to these, the
Holy Spirit Himself accredits the Word by placing His endorsement upon it. This
should be enough for any Christian, simply the fact that God said it in the
Bible ought to be enough to settle any issue in life. (Ryrie)
This is clearly the position the Lord Jesus took, in that
He never questioned the Bibles content, claims, and statements. Remember it was Jesus who said, “If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken;” (John
10:35). Our Lord also said on a different occasion that,
“Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away” (Matthew 24:35).
3) Scripture’s
Claims Should Be Supported By Various Evidences.
Then there are those (Empiricists), on the other hand, who
stress the natural (intrinsic) credibility of the Bible as being worthy of
belief, (that is, axiopistic). “The Bible's claim to authority is not in
itself proof of its authority; rather there exist factual, historical evidences
which constitute the Bible's credentials and validate the truth of its
message.” (Ryrie)
a)
This Is Not an Approach of Unbelief Necessarily, but Rather a Position That
Seeks to Prove What the Bible Claims. This kind of insight can be
incredibly valuable when dealing with skeptics and those who generally discount
the Bible’s message. They can be won
over by proving how the Bible’s message is verified in nature, real science,
history, and by experience.
ILLUSTRATION: The Apostle Paul used this basic approach
while on Mars Hill in Acts 17:22-34, to witness and reveal the UNKNOWN GOD to pagans and
skeptics. Paul used General Revelation that which all men have as common
ground. His basic argument is from Creation, Geography, and Science.
b) I
Personally Believe That There Is Truth in Both These Approaches So That Both
Can and Should Be Used Especially With Critics. Therefore, we will look to both methods today
as we examine the credibility of the Bible. Why? Because of a Biblical
mandate: 1
Peter 3:15, clearly states, "But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a
reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear:".
God in His great wisdom requires that the Christian be able
to skillfully defend the Faith when questioned or even discounted because of an apparent lack of credence.
4) The
Reliability of the Bible’s Content Is Assured by the Lord!
Psalm 12:6, The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
Psalm 19:7, The law of
the Lord is perfect, converting the
soul: the testimony of the Lord is sure,
making wise the simple.
a) It
Is Commonly Held That the Bible Is Full of Historical Errors, Scientific
Impossibilities, and Misstatements. Let us understand that there are many things in the Bible about
which we need fuller light; but let us also state confidently that the Bible is
accurate and reliable. Over and over again, what seems to be discrepancies are
cleared away after careful and prayerful investigation. Psalm 119:160, states, "Thy
word is true from the beginning: and every one of thy righteous judgments
endureth for ever."
b)
There Is Not One Single Proven Inaccuracy in the Whole Bible. The Bible
is accurate historically, geographically, genealogically, scientifically,
psychologically, typologically and verbally.
c)
Bible-believing Baptists Approach Doctrine from the "First Truth"
That the Bible Is Truth. Jesus
said “thy word is Truth” (Jn. 17:17). Many unbelievers;
however, will not accept this premise, so it becomes necessary to actually
prove the Bible for what it claims to be. (R. Sargent)
THE QUESTION IS: "Is the Bible Narrative
Trustworthy?"
THE TEST IS: Compare
Bible Statements with Known Facts.
Lesson:
I. HOW DOES ARCHAEOLOGY TESTIFY TO THE ACCURACY OF THE BIBLE?
Not one archaeological
find disproves accounts in the Bible and many confirm the historical accuracy
of the Bible. This significant area has
continued to prove the Bible’s accuracy!
Many of the attacks on the accuracy of the Bible occurred prior to modern archaeology. However, beginning with major excavations in the
Holy Land in the mid-1800s, archaeological evidence has confirmed the Bible's
historical accuracy time and time again.
As travel became easier and scholars more curious, archaeologists began
to peel away the earth's surface to reveal ancient cities, painted tombs, solid
gold likenesses of rulers, jars, money and items needed for the afterlife,
tablets of stone and clay telling the story of a people or a city, and so on.
As these artifacts piled up, references to biblical places and people surfaced.
In a number of cases, people or places which skeptics had written off as
fanciful mistakes in the Bible were instead confirmed as authentic. In fact, many things that
eighteenth-and nineteenth-century scholars questioned have now been verified
as factual, such as cities and things in those cities, rulers, and important
people. Perhaps the greatest of the
external proofs of the trustworthiness of the Biblical narrative are derived
from the archaeologist's spade. (Anders)
A. ARCHAEOLOGY HAS CONFIRMED BIBLE PERSONALITIES.
1. King Belshazzar (Dan. 5):
Belshazzar, named in the book of Daniel as the last king of Babylon, was
nowhere to be found in Babylonian records: all known Babylonian records listed
Nabonidus as the last king. Then, archaeological records revealed that
Nabonidus left Babylon for ten years and went to Arabia. In his absence, his
son Belshazzar ruled as king in his place during the time of Daniel. In this
way, archaeology explained the apparent discrepancy between the biblical record
and the previous Babylonian record (Paul
Little, Know Why You Believe 95).
2. Sanballat (Neh. 2:19; 4:1): Clifford Wilson, a committed Christian and
retired archaeologist at the University of Sydney in Australia, tells of
evidence of a man named Sanballat, found during
the time of Alexander the Great (356 – 389 BC). A man named Sanballat is also
found in the book of Nehemiah, before
Alexander the Great’s time. Critics often cited this as proof of historical
error in the Bible. But then it was discovered that there were three
Sanballats, and that one of them lived during
the time of Nehemiah. The Bible was right after all (“The Bible: Fable, Fraud or Fact,” Coral Ridge Video Ministry, January
4, 1994).
B. ARCHAEOLOGY HAS CONFIRMED BIBLE HISTORY.
William F. Albright, recognized throughout the world as a
leading Palestinian archaeologist, attests that there is little doubt that
archaeology has confirmed the substantial historical accuracy of Old Testament
tradition.
1. King Solomon’s Extravagant Wealth.
For example, higher critics of Scripture doubted the
Bible’s description of King Solomon’s wealth. But archaeologist Henry Breasted,
between 1925 and 1934, unearthed the remains of one of Solomon’s “chariot
cities” at Megiddo in northern Palestine (2 Chron 1:14; 2 Chron 8:6; 2
Chron 9:25). Mr. Breasted found stables capable of holding more than four
hundred horses and the remains of barracks for Solomon’s chariot battalions
which were stationed to guard a strategic trail that ran through Megiddo.
Nelson Glueck, another archaeologist, found the remains of
a huge refining factory for copper and iron, two metals Solomon used when
bartering for gold, silver, and ivory (see 1 Kin. 9:28; 10:22).
2.
The Existence of the Hittite Clan.
Critics of Scripture also doubted the existence of the
Hittites (Gen. 15:20, Jos. 1:4) a people the Bible refers to some forty-eight
times. Archaeologist Hugh Winckler excavated the Hittite capital of Boghaz-Koi
and recovered thousands of Hittite texts, as well as the famous Hittite code.
Other examples of how archaeology confirms the authority of
the Bible could fill several dozen books. Archaeology helps us see clearly that
our Christian faith rests on facts (actual events) not mere myths or stories.
3. Statement From Archaeologist Nelson Glueck.
More than a century of biblical excavations at over 25,000
sites have repeatedly confirmed the accuracy of the Bible. After working in the field for many years,
noted archaeologist Nelson Glueck said, “It may be stated categorically that no
archaeological discovery has ever controverted (contradicted) a biblical
reference” (quoted in Josh
McDowell, Evidence that Demands a Verdict 1:65).
C. ARCHAEOLOGY HAS CONFIRMED BIBLE CHRONOLOGY.
Archaeological discoveries of contemporary societies have
given much supportive evidence to Biblical events, the order of events, and the
circumstances involved.
The Gospel of Luke has often been attacked for historical
inaccuracies, especially relating to the birth of Christ. Discoveries have now
shown the Romans had regular censuses every 14 years, that Quirinius (Cyrenius)
was the Governor of Syria at around 7 B.C. (Luke
2:1-3) and that Roman procedures for
conducting a census (outlined on a papyrus document discovered in Egypt)
required the return of people to their homelands. (R. Sargent)
D. ARCHAEOLOGY HAS CONFIRMED BIBLE LANDS AND TERRITORIES.
Topography has to do with the layout of the land. It is
evident Bible localities are where the Bible says they were; times taken for
journeys were feasible.
1.
The Five Cities of Gen. 14.
(Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, Zeboiim, Bela)
The discovery of the Ebla Tablets in the 1970's relate to a
kingdom existing around 2,300 B.C. One tablet actually lists the 5 cities
mentioned in Genesis 14:2 in the Biblical order! Until then, the existence of these
cities was doubted by Higher Critics. (R. Sargent)
2. The Plain of Jezreel.
Any visitor to the Holy Land will find desert where the
Bible says there is desert, mountains where the Bible says there are mountains,
etc.
The Plain of Jezreel (which figures in Bible prophecy and
the coming Battle of Armageddon) actually exists, and is a plain, which forms a
strategic passage from the Mediterranean Sea to the Jordan valley without
having to cross mountains.
To be completely candid, we must assess what all this
means. By itself, this does not mean that the Bible is the word of God. It does
mean that the Bible has never been proven wrong on any point of history or
geography.
However, the historical-geographical test must be passed if
we are to conclude that the Bible is the word of God. Mistakes in the record
would cause us to doubt the Bible as the word of God. Since there are no
mistakes in it, it passes the historical-geographical test and allows us, on
that ground, to conclude that it is the word of God. Whether or not we decide
it is the word of God is ultimately a matter of faith, but we would not be able
to make that conclusion if we found the Bible riddled with error. Thank God it is not!
II. WE WILL CONTINUE OUR STUDY ON THE CREDIBILITY OF THE BIBLE IN THE NEXT LESSON.
Today we
have reaffirmed that the inspired books of the Bible are completely reliable
and credible. We have also set forth the Bible’s credentials by means of
archaeology. In doing this, we have
avoided circular reasoning, that is using the Bible to prove the Bible’s
accuracy. Instead we have begun
constructing empirical (experimental or observable) evidences which further
support the biblical truth of inerrancy and trustworthiness.
Many times our arguments from the scriptures are discounted
by liberals, skeptics, and unbelievers because they reject the authority and
accuracy of the Bible. By using external proofs we can perhaps convince the
“doubters” that the Bible is indeed a credible source of information. In any event the Spirit of God must be free to work powerfully in the heart of men. If we have rightly grasped this lesson, we
now have some ammunition to answer the skeptics and prayerfully win them
to Christ eventually. Now, seek to give an answer to every man concerning your confidence
in the Scriptures.
Psalm 12:6, The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
Psalm 19:7, The law of
the Lord is perfect, converting the
soul: the testimony of the Lord is sure,
making wise the simple.
The weight of this argument could enable a person to
believe that the Bible is the Word of God. It takes a mind gravely prejudiced
against the supernatural not to agree that the evidence for the Bible being the
Word of God is strong indeed. So to the question: Can I Trust My Bible? The answer is absolutely!