One of the confusing and
controversial teachings in the New Testament revolves around the identity of
the Family of God and the distinction
of the Church of God from this
Family. Hopefully this study will shine
some light on the subject and minister grace to the heart that chooses to
believe the Word of God over the traditions of men.
First consider Ephesians 3:15, which gives
us the following statement, “Of whom the whole
family in heaven and earth” to
introduce the importance of local church unity by emphasizing the fact that all
believers have the same heavenly Father.
Thus all truly born again believers are brothers and sisters in
Christ–family. That is, "the whole family" of the redeemed including those who have gone before to
heaven and those who are still alive here on earth—are under one Father, the
same Father of our Lord Jesus Christ (Gal. 4:6;
6:10: 1Jn. 3:1). This does not mean that all of these saved
individuals are a part of a church nor comprise an imaginary universal church,
it just simply means that all believers belong to the same family of God. The phrase "the
whole family" clearly identifies
all and everyone belonging to the one family of believers everywhere.
In the book of Galatians, Paul spoke of the “household of faith” in
chapter 6 and verse 10. This "household" or "family" refers to all who have become God's children by "faith"--believing
in Christ-- thus, it includes believers only and excludes all other human
beings. This household does not refer to
the lost multitudes or every creature of God.
In fact the believers are clearly distinguished from "all men" in the
very same verse. This clearly indicates
that the Family of God does not include every person ever born only those who
have been born again from above--born of God (1
John 3:9; 4:7; 5:1; 5:4; 5:18). Again when a person is saved they do not
enter an imaginary universal church, nor do they become a part of a worldwide
body of Christ, they simply are admitted into the Family of God based on their "faith" in
Christ.
The obvious implication is that all of God's spiritual
children are related and belong to the same "household" like a family should (Eph
2:19). Yes, the Family of God extends far
beyond the walls of a particular church or the limits of a specific
denomination to include all true believers.
Thus the whole family of God (Eph.
2:19–“household of God” also Heb. 10:21) derives its “name,” or exists as a family
with one loving father, because of Him.
Again this includes all genuine believers, but God did not refer to this
group as 'the household of the universal church.' "House of
God" (Heb.
10:21; 1Pet. 4:17) is not a figure of speech
for the local church in these verses, but for the Family of God. In Hebrews Christ is presented as the Great
High Priest over the "House of God" and not the church of God.
Though Christ is in view in Hebrews 10:21, the term associates believers with God who has a "house" or
'children' implying the Family of God.
This is an important distinction because Paul is addressing believers
regarding their privileges as believers.
Christ is the High Priest over individual believer priests, so the
imagery of a household here matches.
These privileges belong to believers by virtue of their relationship
with Christ—salvation. Thus they are the children of God. There is one instance in the N.T. where "the house of God"
clearly refers to the local churches in 1
Timothy 3:15.
But bear in mind also that it is used to refer to the Temple in Jerusalem
also in the O.T. and N.T. The emphasis
in such usages is primarily on the dwelling place of God and it appears some 90
times throughout the Bible.
Back in Ephesians 3:15 we find this phrase "Is
named" (Eph. 3:15) in relation
to the "whole family" of God. This of
course refers to a practice in ancient days where a name would reveal a
person's basic character–love in this instance. The entire context of this
passage is the "love of
Christ" as experienced by the
believers one toward another (Eph. 3:14-19). This must be the
significance here of possessing our Father's name and character of love.
Clearly God is presented in the New Testament especially as a loving heavenly
Father with love as an outstanding trait (1Jn.
4:8, 16).
All the saved individuals in Heaven and on earth look to this same
Father as Head and Provider for His family—the Family of God. Since we have a
common LOVING Father, we should be able by His love to live together in the
Lord’s individual churches. Love one for
another should mark each Christian fellowship of believers in an obvious way
and as a testimony to the world of genuine conversion and discipleship (Jn. 13:35; 1Jn. 3:10-14; 4:20-21). These passages in no way encourage spiritual, moral,
ecclesiastical, or doctrinal compromise.
The Lord Jesus himself both taught and exemplified the
truth of the Family of God. In Matthew 12:50, He makes this
shocking statement, “For whosoever shall do the
will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and
mother.” Here the Lord asserts that spiritual
family ties and obligations are just as binding as physical families. Jesus recognized that the family of God was
not based on natural biological relationships but spiritual union with the
Heavenly Father. Thus He refers to His
disciples as being ‘family’ while excluding his biological family from such a
relationship at this point and time in Scripture. Believers likewise should view each other as
spiritual family members, but such is not true of all human beings.
Then again in Matthew 28:10, The Lord Jesus refers to His disciples as His “brethren,” "Then said Jesus unto them, Be not afraid: go tell my
brethren that they go into Galilee, and there shall they see me. Clearly the Savior
recognized these alone as His “brethren,” not merely because they were Jews, but genuine believers
and thus the sons of God. In these
statements, the Lord distinguished God’s Spiritual Family from all Jews and all
unbelieving Gentiles also. All of
humanity does not belong to the Family of God in the spiritual sense, only in
the creature sense. Everyone is not a
child of God automatically; it only includes those who obey the Gospel. Jesus used this same kind of language in Jn. 20:17.
The Apostle Paul was also a strong teacher of the Family of
God. Paul in the book of Hebrews express
the fact that Christ, our great high priest, is the brother of believers and
believers are referred to as “brethren” (Heb. 2:11-17), thus implying the Family of God. Again Paul distinguishes Christ as the superior
brother of believers in Rom. 8:29 and it should be remembered that he is the Son of God in
the most unique way. Likewise Christ is
the believer’s big brother in the most unique sense. All believers are sons of God, but Christ is
The Son of God, all believers are brethren in the Family of God, but Christ is “The Firstborn among many brethren.” Nevertheless, we
find more sound support for the teachings of the Family of God. Again this is referring to all believers and
not church members.
While it is true that all church members should be saved,
but it is possible to be a member of a church and still actually be lost. But, it is absolutely impossible to be a part
of the Family of God without being saved.
We must be born into this relationship with God according to John
chapter 3, and we are at the same time adopted into the family of God and
immediately given the status of intimate adult sons in the Family of God (Rom. 8;14-17; Gal. 4:5-7). Paul
championed this teaching on many different occasions. It is important to recognize once again that
this relationship with God is established upon believing on Christ as Savior (Eph. 1:5, 11-14). In contrast, a person becomes a part of a
church at the time they are baptized or when they transfer their membership to
a church from the one they currently belong to.
Church membership is temporary, but membership in God’s family is
eternal and permanent—you will always be a son of God, you may not always be a
church member. It is also vital to
understand that the Family of God is not based on the fact that we are all
creatures of God, but redemption through Christ.
The Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology stated this
truth in these glowing terms, “For Paul
this fatherhood is based not so much on God's role in creation but rather on
the redemption and reconciliation he has made available in Jesus Christ. This
is why Paul refers to "the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ"
(Rom 15:6; 2 Cor 1:3; 11:31). It is through the work of Christ that God invites
us to call him "Abba, Father." It is through Christ that grace and
peace have resulted and we have become God's children (Rom 8:12-16; 1 Peter
1:3-4; 1 John 3:1).”
Then finally, these teachings of the Universal Body of
Christ Church are popular in this generation of Christians as well as among the
last generation of believers. But it is
still an unnecessary and unbiblical teaching.
The concept actually originated with the Catholic Church centuries
ago. In fact the term catholic literally
means universal. The teaching survived the Reformation in Europe and continued
in just about every mainstream denomination. Like some of the other errors
that entered the Protestant movement this one survived and is still around
today.
But when one is honest with the Bible alone, we have to
conclude that the church is the Body of Christ, but not a worldwide church, but
a local assembly of believers. Every
time the term “body of Christ” is used in the context of the epistles it is referring to
the physical body of the Lord Jesus or to a local assembly of baptized
believers who have organized to carry out the great commission from their
respective locations in the world. Notice how the term is used in 1 Cor. 12:27, “Now ye [the
individual church at Corinth] are the body of
Christ, and members in particular.” The word “ye” refers to the church
collectively and the word “members” refer to the people as individuals within the church
membership. In both respects the church
was located in Corinth and not all over the world. It included only the people there in that
specific assembly and not every believer both in Heaven and in earth. There is no need to confuse the Church of God with the Family of God. Things that are different are not the same
though they may share similarities it does not prove they are the same thing. You
can take two men and dress them in identical suits and stand them right beside
each other in the same room. Though they
may be identical twins, dressed identically, in the same location and share the
same mother and father, they are still in the end two different men. So it is with the Family of God and the
Church of God. There are wonderful
similarities, but they are different groups. Clearly Paul in 1Cor. 12:27 believed that
the Body of Christ was the church at Corinth.
He believed the same thing about other individual N.T. churches. For example consider what he said to the Ephesian Church in Ephes. 4:12, “For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:” Paul was explaining to them the purpose of the local church ministry and the spiritual gifts that Christ gave believers to serve effectively in their church. The body of Christ that they needed to be concerned with edifying was the one in Ephesus. Not every saved person on earth at the time…not every believer in the world, but simply in the context of their own church family. Therefore, Paul believed that the church at Ephesus was also the Body of Christ in that location just like the Church of Corinth was in its location. Once again when Paul addressed the believers of the Church in Colosse, he calls them the “body” of which Christ is the “head.” He also stated that he had suffered must for “his [Christ] body’s sake, which is the church.” This is what he actually says in Col. 1:18, “And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.” Then later he went on to say in Col. 1:24 “Who now rejoice in my sufferings for you [Colossian church], and fill up that which is behind of the afflictions of Christ in my flesh for his body's [Christ’s body] sake, which is the church:” Coupled together we learn that Paul believed that Christ was the head of the church in Colosse and he viewed this local assembly as Christ’s body. He also equated the local assembly with the body of Christ in both of these passages. He was not referring to all believers everywhere, but specifically to the church in Colosse. These passages obviously have application to every true N.T. local church. Just as Paul views the church at Corinth and Ephesus as the Body of Christ so did he consider the one in Colosse likewise.
He believed the same thing about other individual N.T. churches. For example consider what he said to the Ephesian Church in Ephes. 4:12, “For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:” Paul was explaining to them the purpose of the local church ministry and the spiritual gifts that Christ gave believers to serve effectively in their church. The body of Christ that they needed to be concerned with edifying was the one in Ephesus. Not every saved person on earth at the time…not every believer in the world, but simply in the context of their own church family. Therefore, Paul believed that the church at Ephesus was also the Body of Christ in that location just like the Church of Corinth was in its location. Once again when Paul addressed the believers of the Church in Colosse, he calls them the “body” of which Christ is the “head.” He also stated that he had suffered must for “his [Christ] body’s sake, which is the church.” This is what he actually says in Col. 1:18, “And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.” Then later he went on to say in Col. 1:24 “Who now rejoice in my sufferings for you [Colossian church], and fill up that which is behind of the afflictions of Christ in my flesh for his body's [Christ’s body] sake, which is the church:” Coupled together we learn that Paul believed that Christ was the head of the church in Colosse and he viewed this local assembly as Christ’s body. He also equated the local assembly with the body of Christ in both of these passages. He was not referring to all believers everywhere, but specifically to the church in Colosse. These passages obviously have application to every true N.T. local church. Just as Paul views the church at Corinth and Ephesus as the Body of Christ so did he consider the one in Colosse likewise.
In conclusion the Family of God includes all the redeemed
people of God and it does not matter if they are in heaven or on earth. They
have a permanent place as a child of God in His family because of faith in
their Savior. The Lord Jesus Christ, the
Apostle Paul and the Apostle John believed in and taught the truths and
implications of the Family of God. Every
true believer everywhere is a part of this great family; through faith in Christ
we are the sons of God. The church of God, however, is very different from the
Family of God though they are similar in many ways. Paul believed that the local church assembly
and the “Body of Christ” were one and the same with the Lord Jesus as the Head and
Leader of each church. He is not
presented as the Head of all churches collectively as one body, but as the Head
of many individual bodies in different locations. Each of them performing the Lord’s will and
work with Christ as the Leader through the Holy Spirit.
Let us once and for all rid ourselves of old false teachings
and misconceptions to fully and more completely embrace what God actually and
plainly stated in the New Testament about his churches and the Family of
God. Let us pledge our allegiance to
Christ and the church He has placed us in to fulfill the role he has prepared
and gifted us to fulfill among your local body of believers. Indeed it is a high and honorable thing in
both respects to be a son in the Family of God and a member of Christ’s body—
the Church of God. As sons, let us honor
our Father through faith and obedience to Him.
Then as church members, let us respond faithfully to every directive of
our Head, the Lord Jesus Christ, to do his service in our respective areas. As the sons of God let us exercise love one
for another as brethren. Then as the
members of Christ’s body let us serve in our local assembly to edify one
another in love. But, always bear in
mind that things that are different are not the same.
In Matthew 28:10, the Lord Jesus refers to His disciples as His “brethren,” "Then said Jesus unto them, Be not afraid: go tell my brethren that they go into Galilee, and there shall they see me. Clearly the Savior recognized these alone as His “brethren,” not merely because they were Jews, but genuine believers and thus the sons of God.
ReplyDeletehttps://maxevangel.blogspot.com/2016/03/the-family-of-god.html
#Father #Family #God #Children #Sons #Household #Faith #MaxEvangel
Christ is the believer’s big brother in the most unique sense. All believers are sons of God, but Christ is The Son of God, all believers are brethren in the Family of God, but Christ is “The Firstborn among many brethren.” Nevertheless, we find more sound support for the teachings of the Family of God. Again this is referring to all believers and not church members.
ReplyDeletehttps://maxevangel.blogspot.com/2016/03/the-family-of-god.html
#Father #Family #Children #Faith #Jesus #God #Salvation #MaxEvangel
Christ is the believer’s big brother in the most unique sense. All believers are sons of God, but Christ is The Son of God, all believers are brethren in the Family of God, but Christ is “The Firstborn among many brethren.” Nevertheless, we find more sound support for the teachings of the Family of God. Again this is referring to all believers and not church members.
ReplyDeletehttps://maxevangel.blogspot.com/2016/03/the-family-of-god.html
#Father #Family #Children #Faith #Jesus #God #Salvation #MaxEvangel