Like many
Americans, I was absolutely astonished when I heard about the Virginia Tech
massacre on April 16th, 2007 (Hauser & O’ Conner, 2007). It was
difficult to believe we were facing another heinous crime on another academic
campus. I remember viewing the news coverage and staring at the television in
utter unbelief. While glaring at the screen, I asked myself repeatedly, “Who
would do this? Why would anyone do such an awful thing?” A student of Virginia
Tech, Seung-Hui Cho, took two hand guns and killed 32 people, wounded 17
others, and then took his own life. It was the worst act of mass murder on a
college campus in the USA. Clearly something substantial must be done to
prevent this from ever happening again.
Politically, I am
a conservative with some moderate views and positions. With regards to civil
liberties, I loathe arbitrary government interference, and specifically any
denial of guaranteed Bill of Rights freedoms. I am a civil libertarian of
moderate degree; I respect and value personal privacy. Like many Americans, I
hate the idea of the government needlessly prying into the business of private
citizens. As long as they live legally and ethically, leave people alone. However,
I do support the Patriot Act, and those measures by the FBI, CIA, and other law
enforcement agencies prosecuting the war on terror. I basically embrace the
idea that safety and national security are worthy values and are just as
important as our civil liberties. Admittedly, embracing both realities creates
a critical tension that is undeniable. So I trust government agencies to
execute their responsibilities without needlessly prying into American lives.
Congress must hold them accountable on our behalf to protect our civil
liberties. Regarding college campuses, US law makers, college administrators, teachers,
and students must not only protect civil liberties, but by all means seriously
endeavor to prevent such massacres.
Regarding law-makers,
Second Amendment rights need to be protected, but effective gun control
legislation must be passed and diligently enforced. It is imperative that law-makers
take responsible actions concerning gun control legislation because this will
impact campus security. The US Constitution provides for gun ownership as
protection against hostile government takeover and private hand gun ownership
for self-defense. The US Supreme Court
upheld this provision in District of
Columbia vs. Heller (2008) and McDonald
vs. Chicago (2010). Government is not to interfere with this guarantee to
responsible law-abiding citizens; this must apply to eligible teachers and
students. Simultaneously effective gun control legislation needs to be adopted
on the state and federal levels to keep guns out of the wrong hands. Over
28,000 people die annually from gun violence. There are “more than 100,000
people each year who are killed or wounded with a gun in our country,”
according to the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence (http://www.bradycenter.org).
Since 1980 approximately 300 people have lost their lives in school shootings
in the United States (http://www.slate.com). Responsible reflection on these
facts leads us to no other alternative; more must be done to bolster safety of
children and young people on American campuses. It was Bill O’Reilly who
advocates the federalization of all hand gun crimes with extended prison terms.
He believes this will effectively reduce the number of criminal elements in
society (http://www.foxnews.com). In the USA, it must be universally
established that gun purchases can only be transacted after a Brady criminal
background check. This involves any and all gun purchases to include those by ‘unlicensed
merchants’ at gun shows. Furthermore gun owners who fail to secure their
weapons properly should be regarded as complicit in crimes committed with their
weapons. The aim is not to ban guns altogether, but to call Americans to
responsibility regarding the sale and ownership of guns for the safety of
students. Gun owners and potential gun owners must be willing to face a fair
amount of scrutiny to achieve this goal.
Not only must campus
safety be sought through legislation, but college administrators can make an
important contribution to campus security also. While they uphold the
importance of civil liberties, they must also craft policies to enhance campus
security. Enhancing safety in our
educational institutions must become a higher priority and administrators establish
priorities. In addition, measures that
support conceal and carry gun licenses should be revisited and reinforced
particularly for qualifying teachers and college students. Campus security
forces need to increase and be specifically trained to reduce the threat of
murder on campus. Colleges should bring in subject matter experts to inform,
train, and heighten awareness on campus relative to gun violence. Such
information could be incorporated into students’ orientation packages,
briefings, or official communications from the college. I have a daughter who
will be off to college soon, and I certainly want the assurance that everything
that could be done to protect her is being done.
Another major high-tension
concern is the privacy of individual students. To some degree, teachers and
student must honor individual privacy, but simultaneously emphasize community
member’s responsibility for the safety of the whole (Goldstein, 1997). A
certain level of privacy must be sacrificed for greater safety. Goldstein in an
article entitled “Why It’s OK to Rat on Other Students,” rightly advocates,
both ideals saying, “we can begin a long-over-due discussion about how we
encourage and defend our students’ civil liberties—while doing a lot more to
enhance their safety” (1997, para. 6). He further purports that both teachers
and students identify and “rat out” students with strange behavioral patterns (para.
16). Both parties have a vested interest in detecting and reporting students or
faculty that could pose a threat to the institution. Students must be
encouraged to inform on fellow students for the sake of campus safety (para. 15).
Looking the other way when something suspicious happens or merely minding one’s
own business is no longer a luxury we can afford. If one sees something, then
report it to someone in authority. While civil liberties, including the right
to privacy, should remain as free as possible of arbitrary government or
private interference, students must do more to safeguard themselves on college
campuses.
Clearly American
college campuses must undertake thoughtful measures to address gun violence and
campus security. American law makers on
the state and federal levels, education administrators, teachers, and students
must take this matter seriously. Every reasonable initiative to ensure safety
on college campuses must be diligently considered. This demands vigorous
exploration because valuable bedrock civil liberties are at stake. Yes,
protecting students’ civil rights and privacy are important, but so is
protecting college campuses from mass murderers. The inherent tension is
significant, but law-makers, college administrators, professors, and students
must meet this challenge with common sense workable solutions. Without a doubt,
we need God’s wisdom to decide for a more hopeful future on our campuses.
References
Brady
Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Retrieved from http://bradycampaign.org
Goldstein, W. 1997, “Why Its OK to
Rat on Other Students.” Chronicles of
Higher Education, Vol. 53, Issue 35.
Hauser,
C. & O’ Conner A. (2007, April 16) Virginia Tech shooting leaves 33 dead. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
Kirk,
C. (2012, Dec. 19) “Since 1980, 297 people have been killed in school shootings.”
Retrieved from http://www.slate.com
Muller,
G. & Wiener, H. S. (2009). To the
point reading and writing short arguments, (2nd ed.) Pearson Education,
Inc., NY: Pearson Longman
O’Reilly,
B. (Political Commentator). (2013, February 08). Bill O’Reilly on gun control:
all gun crimes should be federal offenses, Guns, Football, and Murder [Cable television
series episode]. Retrieved from http://www.foxnews.com
Like many Americans, I was absolutely astonished when I heard about the Virginia Tech massacre on April 16th, 2007 (Hauser & O’ Conner, 2007). It was difficult to believe we were facing another heinous crime on another academic campus. I remember viewing the news coverage and staring at the television in utter unbelief. While glaring at the screen, I asked myself repeatedly, “Who would do this? Why would anyone do such an awful thing?”
ReplyDeletehttps://maxevangel.blogspot.com/2015/10/college-massacres-freedom-versus.html
#Guns #Law #SecondAmendment #Rights #Congress #Killings #VirginiaBeach #Hope #MaxEvangel
The US Constitution provides for gun ownership as protection against hostile government takeover and private hand gun ownership for self-defense. The US Supreme Court upheld this provision in District of Columbia vs. Heller (2008) and McDonald vs. Chicago (2010). Government is not to interfere with this guarantee to responsible law-abiding citizens....
ReplyDeletehttps://maxevangel.blogspot.com/2015/10/college-massacres-freedom-versus.html
#Guns #Law #SecondAmendment #Rights #Congress #Killings #VirginiaBeach #Hope #MaxEvangel
The US Constitution provides for gun ownership as protection against hostile government takeover and private hand gun ownership for self-defense. The US Supreme Court upheld this provision in District of Columbia vs. Heller (2008) and McDonald vs. Chicago (2010). Government is not to interfere with this guarantee to responsible law-abiding citizens....
ReplyDeletehttps://maxevangel.blogspot.com/2015/10/college-massacres-freedom-versus.html
#Guns #Law #SecondAmendment #Rights #Congress #Killings #VirginiaBeach #Hope #MaxEvangel